The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

NYT Article: Typographical Error



Barbara Crossette's article, "U.S. Monitor Now Argues Iraq Has Little to Hide," New York Times, 3 
July 2000  <http://www.nytimes.com/library/world/global/070300un-ritter.html> contains a glaring 
and important typographical error:

*****************************************************************
In his article, Mr. Ritter wrote that given the comprehensive nature of the former monitoring 
regime, "it was possible as early as 1997 to determine that, from a quantitative standpoint, Iraq 
had been disarmed."
*****************************************************************

Ritter actually wrote "it was possible as early as 1997 to determine that, from a QUALITATIVE 
standpoint, Iraq had been disarmed." (Scott Ritter, "The Case for Iraq's Qualitative Disarmament," 
Arms Control Today, Vol. 30, No. 5 (June 2000), pg. 8, paragraph 6)

Never once in the article does Ritter claim that Iraq was or is quantitatively disarmed. The New 
York Times' misquote is rather critical, for Ritter's primary points are to distinguish between 
quantitative and qualitative disarmament, detail, weapons sector by weapons sector, Iraq's 
qualitative disarmament, and then make a policy proposal based on Iraq's qualitative disarmament.  

To see the Arms Control Today article: <http://www.armscontrol.org/ACT/june00/iraqjun.htm>

With regards,

Nathaniel Hurd,
Boston, USA
-----------------------------------------------
FREE! The World's Best Email Address @email.com
Reserve your name now at http://www.email.com


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a discussion list run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq
For removal from list, email soc-casi-discuss-request@lists.cam.ac.uk
Full details of CASI's various lists can be found on the CASI website:
http://welcome.to/casi


[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]