The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [casi] A Shadow BBC or A Shadow of the Real BBC for US? Ditto CBC?



>Also look at the New York Times, which is heavily pro-Israel,
which has a policy of supporting the sanctions, Philippa Winkler

===== Original Message From nagy <nagy@gwu.edu> =====
>Dear Colleagues,
>
>    I am trying to understand why so many even well educated Americans are so
>far out of touch with the evils of economic sanctions and other American
>foreign policy crime and folly.
>
>    Can anyone point me to information on the foreign policy content of the
>real  BBC in England (especially regarding the Middle East) vs what appears
to
>be a misleading  watered-down, censored version which is broadcast here in
the
>U.S.
>
>    Is there solid proof of my impression that there is a BBC that often get
>facts right (despite many exceptions) and raises tough fundamental issues
>(despite evading many), but that this relatively competent version  gets
>heavily censored before it is deemed fit for the U.S. market to hear via the
>U.S. "National Public Broadcasting".
>
>
>     I have a parallel question regarding CBC which is also broadcast  in the
>U.S. by NPR (sardonically? misleading? an acronym for "National Public
>Broadcasting" in reality it is does little more than parrot the press release
>of the the US gov. and its mega  corporations.
>
>   Thanks in advance for any help especially urls,
>
>Tom
>Thomas J. Nagy, Ph.D.
>Assoc. Prof.
>George Washington University
>"At the Center of it all" -- my U's marketing promo
>
>
>>===== Original Message From g c <jensen2@cafe-uni.com> =====
>>The usual statement of the Iraq expulsion of the inspectors was repeated yet
>again on Any Questions last night by Ben Bradshaw.
>>I rang the Beeb to say that the inspectors were withdrawn by UNSCOM and he
>asked if I could give any documentation to verify this .
>>Can anyone give me the appropriate URL or anything offiical to support this
?
>>Thanks
>>J2
>>
>>
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------
>>See how the rest of the world sees today's news  at
http://www.cafe-uni.com.
>>News of  world events and international politics  from the world's
newspapers
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>Express yourself with a super cool email address from BigMailBox.com.
>>Hundreds of choices. It's free!
>>http://www.bigmailbox.com
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
>>To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss
>>To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk
>>All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
>To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss
>To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk
>All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk


_______________________________________________
Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss
To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk
All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk


[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]