[casi] legality, logic, sanity - rip

["farbuthnot" <asceptic@DELETETHISfreenetname.co.uk>]

[ Presenting plain-text part of multi-format email ]

Taken from Al-Awda, with thanks.

Dick Armey and Ethnic Cleansing of Palestinians
Date: Thu, May 2, 2002, 6:38 pm


ADC Action Alert:
Demand Dick Armey Retract Call for Ethnic Cleansing of Palestinians

Last night on MSNBC's highly-rated program Hardball, House Republican
Majority Leader Dick Armey ( R-TX) called for the ethnic cleansing of
Palestinians from the occupied territories and endorsed Israel's
conquests of those lands.† Armey said that he °ßis content to have a
Palestinian state°® but is °ßnot content to give up any part of Israel for
the purpose of a Palestinian state.°® He defined the Palestinian
territories occupied by Israel-East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza
Strip-as Israel.† He also said he has °ßthought this through for a lot of
years°® and believes that Palestinians living in the West Bank should be
removed. Armey stated that °ßthere are many Arab nations that have many
hundreds of thousands of acres of land, soil, and property and
opportunity to create a Palestinian state.°® An incredulous Chris
Mathews, host of Hardball, repeatedly gave Armey the opportunity to
clarify that he was not calling for the ethnic cleansing of all
Palestinians from Palestine, but the House Republican chief refused to
do so:

MATTHEWS: Well, just to repeat, you believe that the Palestinians who
are now living on the West Bank should get out of there?
Rep. ARMEY: Yes.

Armey°¶s call for the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians is an
endorsement of massive war crimes probably rising to the level of crimes
against humanity. Armey owes the American and Palestinian people, and
indeed the entire world, an immediate retraction and apology.† The
complete transcript of his remarks can be read in the transcript below.

ACTION REQUESTED:

ADC urges all its members and supporters to contact Dick Armey and
demand that he not only retract but also apologize for his endorsement
of ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.

House Republican Majority Leader Dick Armey (R-TX)
301 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515-4326

Tel: 202-225-7772 (Personal Office)
Fax: 202-226-2028 (Personal Office)

Tel: 202-225-4000 (Congressional Leadership Office)
Fax: 202-226-8100 (Congressional Leadership Office)

Comments can also be sent via his website at: <http://armey.house.gov>


TRANSCRIPT
Hardball with Chris Matthews (9:00 PM ET) - CNBC
May 1, 2002 Wednesday

CHRIS MATTHEWS, host: Congressman Dick Armey of Texas leads the
Republicans in the US House of Representatives.

Congressman Armey, Mr. Majority Leader, why is the Congress about to
pass a resolution supporting Israel at a time that the president is
trying to walk a line between Israel and its Arab neighbors?

Representative RICHARD ARMEY (Republican, Majority Leader): Well, we've
had--we feel very strongly in the House of Representatives that we have
a moral obligation to protect the safety, security and freedom of
Israel. And the Congress wants to speak on that, both bodies want to do
so. We've discussed it with the White House, and everybody is
comfortable. We will go--go ahead with that tomorrow.† It is very
important to the world that Israel be--the freedom of Israel be
protected and honored.

MATTHEWS: What good is this going to do anybody?

Rep. ARMEY: Well, I think, again, we--we want to make the point...

MATTHEWS: To whom?

Rep. ARMEY: The president of the United States is trying to make a
transition in foreign policy from what it has been to what it must be in
the future.† We can no longer appease aggressors in the Middle East.
There obviously will never be a peace.† The goal is no Jews between them
and the sea, and we must make it very clear that if you want to talk
about peace and talk the talk, you must walk the walk, and that must be
respect for Israel's right to live freely, safely and securely.

MATTHEWS: OK.† Let's talk about the realities over there.† There's a
fight between the Arabs and the--and the Israelis over who owns the
Pal--all of Palestine.† Do you support the idea that there be a
Palestine state alongside Israel?

Rep. ARMEY: I am perfectly content to have a Palestinian state alongside
Israel if it is a state that honors others borders.

MATTHEWS: You are in total, 180 disagreement with Tom Delay who said
this week that the entire West Bank belongs to Israel and it belongs to
that country that's not an Arab country.

Rep. ARMEY: I...

MATTHEWS: It should not have a statehood.

Rep. ARMEY: No, I'm perfectly content to have a Palestinian state.† I am
not content to give up any part of Israel for that purpose of that
Palestinian state.

MATTHEWS: Wait a minute.† Tom Delay's, whose resolution you're going to
put on the floor tomorrow and schedule, has said that the entire West
Bank, he calls it Judean Samaria, belongs to Israel. How can you say
that this resolution doesn't support the Delay position which is Israel
has a right to grab the entire West Bank?

Rep. ARMEY: No, I--I'm content to have Israel grab the entire West Bank.
I'm also content to have the Palestinians have a homeland and even for
that to be somewhere near Israel, but I'm not content to see Israel give
up land for the purpose of peace to the Palestinians who will not accept
it and would not honor it.† It is time to...

MATTHEWS: Well, where do you put the Palestinian state, in Norway?† Once
the Israelis take back the West Bank permanently and annex it, there's
no place else for the Palestinians to have a state.

Rep. ARMEY: No, no, that's not--that's not at all true.† There are many
Arab nations that have many hundreds of thousands of acres of land
and--and soil and property and opportunity to create a Palestinian
state.

MATTHEWS: So you would transport--you would transport the Palestinians
from Palestine to somewhere else and call it their state?

Rep. ARMEY: I would be perfectly content to have a homeland, just
as--most of...

MATTHEWS: But not in Palestine?

Rep. ARMEY: Most of the people who now populate Israel were transported
from all over the world to that land and they made it their home.† The
Palestinians can do the same, and we're per--perfectly content to work
with the Palestinians in doing that.† We are not willing to sacrifice
Israel for the notion of a Palestinian homeland.

MATTHEWS: Right, no.† No, that's not the question and that's not your
answer.† The question here is: What is the future of the Palestinians
who are fighting Israel right now?† You say there future is somewhere
besides Palestine.† That runs in the way of US policy going back to
1948.† It runs--it runs completely against the president's policy and
every policy I've heard a president take, which is that Israel has to
give up its settlements on the West Bank and give it back to the Arabs
in exchange for peace.† You say the deal should be the Palestinians
leave?

Rep. ARMEY: That's right.† Palestinians say the deal should be the
Israel--that--that the Israelis leave.

MATTHEWS: Have you talked about this with the president?

Rep. ARMEY: I happened to believe that the Palestinians should leave.

MATTHEWS: Have you ever told George Bush, the president from your home
state of Texas, that you think the Palestinians should get up and go and
leave Palestine and that's the solution?

Rep. ARMEY: I'm probably telling him that right now.† This is...

MATTHEWS: Have you thought this through?

Rep. ARMEY: I have thought this through.† I've thought it through for a
lot of years.† I believe that Israel is the state for the Jewish people.
It needs to be honored.† It needs to be protected.

MATTHEWS: Yeah.† That's not what you're saying.† You're saying Israel
should expand its borders to the Jordan River...

Rep. ARMEY: No.

MATTHEWS: ...and kick out all the Palestinians?† That's what you just
said.

Rep. ARMEY: I am--I am content to have Israel occupy that land that it
now occupies and to have those people who have been aggressors against
Israel retired to some other arena, and I would be happy to have them
make a home.† I would be happy to have all of these Arab nations that
have been so hell bent to drive Israel out of the Middle East to get
together, find some land and make a home for the Palestinians.† I think
it can be done.

MATTHEWS: So the president, who has been dutifully, for the last couple
of weeks, trying to get the Israeli army to withdraw from the West Bank,
should stop that, let the Israeli defense force take over the West Bank
and hold it and make it part of Israel?† You completely disagree with
the president's policy then?

Rep. ARMEY: I am--I am perfectly content to have Israel hold and occupy
the land that it has at this moment.

MATTHEWS: Well, how about though-how about the Jenin in Samaria?† Tom
Delay, whose measure you're putting on the floor tomorrow, says that all
the West Bank, Jenin, Judea, Masada, everything belongs to Israel. It's
not occupied territory.
It's Israeli.† Is that your position?

Rep. ARMEY: Well, first of all, Chris, I think we have to be real
careful on how you are interpreting jo--Tom's provision.† I think Tom's
provision is principally and primarily that the Jewish people have a
right to defend themselves.

MATTHEWS: Well, just to repeat, you believe that the Palestinians who
are now living on the West Bank should get out of there?

Rep. ARMEY: Yes.

MATTHEWS: OK.† Thank you very much.† More with Congressman Dick Armey
coming back.† You're watching HARDBALL.
† (Announcements)

MATTHEWS: We're back with Congressman Dick Army who is head of the
Republican Party.† He's majority leader of the US House of
Representatives.

Mr. Armey, the president's people, somebody in the highest levels of
this administration, is leaking the fact that the United States is
planning to attack Iraq sometime in next year.† Do you think that would
require a congressional resolution?

Rep. ARMEY: I don't know that that leak is out there.† It's--I'm missing
it if it's out there.† I have to tell you, Chris, in the last year or
so, I've come to where I hardly trust anything I read in the papers
anymore until the president of the United States tells me himself that
he is planning such an operation.

MATTHEWS: Yeah.† So he never mentioned that in the meeting--in the
breakfast meeting today he never mentioned Iraq?

Rep. ARMEY: No, he certainly did not.† He certainly--he certainly did
not and he certainly did not talk about any kind of military operation
relative to Iraq.

MATTHEWS: Just so the people out there know where the House of
Representatives stands, does the--does the House of Representatives have
to vote to support a US military attack on Iraq if the president chooses
to make one?

Rep. ARMEY: I would think that as we've seen this president and his
father act in the past, before he took any kind of military action that
deployed our troops on a field of conflict, he would probably come to us
and ask for our support and our consideration in the matter.

MATTHEWS: Well, under the Constitution, would that be necessary?

Rep. ARMEY: I think the con--you'll have to go to a constitutional
scholar on that.† There's so much confusion on that point right now.† I
cannot answer it within a hypothetical context.

MATTHEWS: OK.† Let me ask you about this bad news we got this week from
Director Mueller, who is head of the FBI, that they haven't found a
shred of paper that gives us any idea of how the September 11th horror
was--was concocted, planned, carried out.† No evidence at all.

Rep. ARMEY: Well, I--you've got a bunch of people hiding in caves,
working out plans and scheming and plotting.† Why are we upset that we
don't have any hard paper trail on that?† I--I would never have expected
to have found one.

MATTHEWS: How do we--how do we feel that we've ended the war against
al-Qaeda and caught the people who did what they did September 11th?
How do we know we've won that war?

Rep. ARMEY: Well, I don't know for sure when you know you've won that
war. We don't know how many people are scattered all over the world.
This is a--a case even where if you caught and killed bin Laden you got
a snake that can continue to crawl and continue to be dangerous even if
the head has been cut off it.† So you have to stay vigilant for a very,
very long time.

MATTHEWS: Whose head would you rather get, Mr. Leader, Mr. Armey? Would
you rather get the head of Osama bin Laden or the head of Saddam Hussein
if you had it on the platter?† If you were a salome right now and--and
St. John was offering you a head, which head would you demand?

Rep. ARMEY: Well, I think right now the world would say 'We--we've got
to stop bin Laden who is--who has said, "I'll take this terror to every
corner of the world."'

MATTHEWS: Right.

Rep. ARMEY: Saddam Hussein is--at least is confining himself, as it is
right now, to his own territory, although we're sure he's supporting
terrorists across the world.

MATTHEWS: I like--I like you now you've said what I wanted you to say
finally which is we've got to get bin Laden.† Thank you very much, US
Congressman Dick Armey of Texas.

Rep. ARMEY: OK.








_______________________________________________
Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss
To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk
All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk