The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[casi] Support our troops? - Albert



A good case for why we might indeed "support our troops" but with real
support not the way *they* would have us do.

http://www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=3255&sectionID=15

Support Our Troops

by Michael Albert; March 17, 2003

If war comes even despite the historic, tenacious, and comprehensive
opposition now raging across the planet, the U.S. government will proclaim
triumphantly that everyone who isn’t a traitor needs to rally around
Washington to “support our troops.” Opponents of the war could opt for many
possible replies.


We could point out that our troops in Iraq are barely in danger at all
because they are assaulting a tenth-rate opponent that has no serious means
to defend Iraq much less to attack the world’s sole superpower.


We could point out that while perhaps a few hundred U.S. troops will die in
this war, way over 50,000 U.S. citizens will die in the next 12 months due
to workplace accidents and death by industry-caused diseases and automobile
accidents (not to mention the impact of pollution and unsafe products). We
could then query why this massive yearly blight on our population, roughly
15 times as devastating as 9/11, doesn’t provoke a war on corporations’
profit-seeking violations of their employees’ and consumers’ health and safety.


Or we could point out that the lives of American troops are no more worthy
of compassionate support than the lives of Iraqis, and that we didn’t kill
Hussein a million times over with our decade- long sanctions but we instead
killed a million Iraqis once each -- with Hussein getting stronger as each
new corpse was added to the carnage.


And of course we could explain how unleashing a campaign to “shock and awe”
a country is unjust and immoral, how it is an archetype example of the
terrorism we say we are against.

But for myself, I think that perhaps a different approach might work
better, and so if war does come, I intend to reply to the demand to support
our troops by saying that yes, I too “support our troops.”


I will reply that I support our troops not having to kill people in Iraq.


I support our troops not being ordered to assault defenseless populations,
towns, farms, and the infrastructural sinews of life that sustain a whole
country’s citizenry.


I support our troops not having to carry out orders from Commander in Chief
George Bush and then having to live the rest of their lives wondering why
they obeyed such a barbaric buffoon rather than resisting his illegitimate,
immoral authority.


And for the same reason, I support the Pope and the Dalai Lama going to
Iraq in the place of our troops, as human shields and also to aid those
Iraqis who have already suffered under our sanctions and bombs as well as
under the violence of Hussein who was, of course, previously the recipient
of U.S. military aid and even U.S. guidance in his horrible undertakings.


In fact, I support all rabbis and priests and other moral leaders going to
Iraq as human shields – and all past Noble Peace Prize winners -- and all
past winners of any big peace or humanitarian prize at all, anywhere -- and
heads of state, for that matter.


I support our troops not dying in Iraq figuratively or literally,
physically or psychologically. I support our troops coming home with their
hearts not broken, retaining humanity and compassion essential to feeling
true solidarity with those who confront tyrannical behavior abroad, or
right here in the U.S. with its 30 million tyrannized poor.


I support our troops coming home with their minds ravenous to comprehend
what is wrong with war for empire, what is wrong with war to obliterate
international law, what is wrong with war to control oil and use it as a
bludgeon against allies and enemies alike, what is wrong with war for
profit, what is wrong with war to intimidate whole nations and continents,
what is wrong with war to subordinate a planet and even to test and trumpet
the tools of war.


What must it do to one’s mind and soul to engage as a soldier in a war in
which the enemy is defenseless, in which the motives of one’s leaders are
vile, and in which one’s own say over the events is nil?


I support our troops refusing to kill on behalf of politicians and
profiteers. I support our troops rebelling against orders, not obeying
them. I support our troops rejecting reasons of state. And I support our
troops coming home to where their real battle is.


We must battle to reinvest our society with aspirations for justice and
equality and with respect for diversity, solidarity, and self-management.


We must battle to eliminate the scourge of private ownership that makes a
few people as rich as whole populations and that leaves many people less
rich than the pets of profiteers.


We must battle to totally eradicate the racism and sexism that denigrate
whole sectors of the population, to free sexuality and culture, to free
creativity, and to sustain the environment.


Bush tells us to bomb Iraq on grounds Iraq may have bombs. He tells us to
bomb Iraq on grounds Iraq curtails freedoms. He tells us to bomb Iraq on
grounds Iraq may be abetting terrorism.


What then should we do about a country that has by far the most bombs in
the world and that uses them most widely—and that brags about it shamelessly?


What should we do about a country that is currently curtailing freedoms
abroad and moving to do so at home with a dangerously escalating vigor—and
that brags about it shamelessly?

And what should we do about a country that is producing terrorism most
aggressively – both terrorism directed at others and also terrorism which
will be unleashed against us in reply—and that brags about it shamelessly.


What should we do about the U.S.? We should curtail its belligerency,
change its regime, and fundamentally revolutionize its centers of wealth
and power.


Support our troops, bring them home.


Support our troops, provide them housing.


Support our troops, provide them health care.


Support our troops, provide them socially valuable jobs.


Turn military bases into industrial centers for the production of low cost
housing, schools, hospitals, daycare centers, rail lines, inner city parks,
and other social and public goods that can enrich rather than snuff out life.

Support our troops and one day they will join the fight for unlimited
justice for all.

Support our troops.



_______________________________________________
Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss
To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk
All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk


[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]