The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
Fine, if La Route is biased or nuts then why does this list tolerate posts from nice folks who keep making believe that the anti sanctions movement, rather than the West, was the big buddy of S.H. supplying him with money, weapons including the biological from (10 miles or so from here) Rockville, Maryland, USA..? Oh yeah and all the posts about missing POWs... I think that even the CIA has officially given up on the U.S. Prisoner of War held in Iraq since the first invasion of 1991 as a cruel and blatant fraud. Of course the ever vigilant CIA waited till after the 2003 invasion to make their "revelation" -- mustn't interfere with the lies kicking up the war hysteria, right? It's all will and good to ask about credibility, but must we be as selective as HRW and AI, etc. or could we have some consistency here? By the way where did AI ever apologize for the utterly discredited Kuwaiti babies tossed from incubators lie that lauched the 1991 invasion of Iraq, after the other story lines flunked the marketing tests? After that Kuwaiti babies lie was firmly planted (with the help of Rep. Lantos and his ever vigilant, but oh so selective defenders infants), where, when and how prominent were the retractions? What did the people and organizations that sold us the equivalent of the "S.H. can launch a devastating WMD attack in 45 minutes" do to set the record straight then and now? tom Voices UK wrote: > As I explained in my e-mail, my post on La Rouche - like the posts on the > board of Human Rights Watch - related to the *source* of other posts to the > List (which were directly about Iraq). Consequently it was, I believe, > relevant. After all if someone is posting links to the list from the > originator of a US cult, isn't it fair (and relevant) to point this out? > > Best wishes, > > Gabriel > (in a personal capacity) > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John-Peter Hopperger" <j-ph@mindspring.com> > To: <casi-discuss@lists.casi.org.uk> > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 4:59 AM > Subject: Re: [casi] Lyndon La Rouche and EIR > > > Dear Gabriel, > > > > I'm surprised at what appears to be inconsistency on your part. You > > repeatedly requested CASI posters to confine their topic to Iraq. As > > the recipient of one of these, I thought it reasonable and consented. > > > > Imagine my surprise on coming to the end of your post ([casi] Lyndon > > La Rouche and EIR), and seeing my search for Iraq references remain > > unrewarded. The entire piece deals with issues Dr. Manning Marable > > seems to have with Lyndon LaRouche. Worse, his documentation > > lingers around 1984-1986. > > > > I actually found Andreas' selection from the Avesta more pertinent to > > our concerns for Iraq. At least the ancient Persian text deals with the > > character of those with whose geopolitical actions we disagree. Is > > it only spiritually flavored non-Iraq posts we should avoid? > > > > Best regards, > > > > JPH > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. > > To unsubscribe, visit > http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss > > To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk > > All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. > To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss > To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk > All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk