The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[casi] US: Re-engineering MINDS for fear of REALITY



"The advisory group's report, titled "Changing Minds, Winning Peace, ... "

" .... The advisory panel said that it recognized that American policies
MIGHT WELL BE the root of the problem, but that Washington could do far more
to present its side of the issues and rebut widespread misinformation among
Muslims overseas. ...."

" The group's major recommendations, besides creating a new White House
director of public diplomacy, were to build libraries and information
centers in the Muslim world, translate more Western books into Arabic,
increase scholarships and visiting fellowships, upgrade the American
Internet presence, and train more Arabists, Arab speakers and public
relations specialists. .."


-----------------------------------------------

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/01/politics/01DIPL.html?adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1065169360-0zsMWdeajkyWhckRUVYSAA

October 1, 2003
U.S. Must Counteract Image in Muslim World, Panel Says
By STEVEN R. WEISMAN

ASHINGTON, Sept. 30 - The United States must drastically increase and
overhaul its public relations efforts to salvage its plummeting image among
Muslims and Arabs abroad, a panel chosen by the Bush administration has
found.

"Hostility toward America has reached shocking levels," the panel stated in
its report, which will be released Wednesday. "What is required is not
merely tactical adaptation but strategic, and radical, transformation."

The report added that "spin" and manipulative public relations "are not the
answer," but that neither is avoiding the debate. A copy of the report was
made available Tuesday to The New York Times.

The panel warned that the war in Iraq and the intensified conflict in the
Middle East had increased anger at the United States, and that people
throughout the world were ignorant of or misinformed about American
policies.

"A process of unilateral disarmament in the weapons of advocacy over the
last decade has contributed to widespread hostility toward Americans and
left us vulnerable to lethal threats to our interests and our safety," said
the panel, the United States Advisory Group on Public Diplomacy for the Arab
and Muslim World.

Led by Edward P. Djerejian, an Arab specialist and former ambassador and
White House spokesman, the panel spent several months surveying the American
efforts to promote the United States' views to the world's 1.5 billion
Muslims. Its 13 members, including academics, diplomats and writers,
traveled to the Middle East, Asia and Europe.

The committee found that the State Department spent about $600 million last
year on its programs to advocate American policies, and $540 million more
for the Voice of America and other broadcast networks.

If the $100 million to expand economic aid in the Middle East is included,
the report notes, the total is about three-tenths of a percent of the
Defense Department budget.

Examining those figures, however, the panel found that only $150 million of
the "public diplomacy" budget was spent in Muslim-majority countries, and
most of that went to exchange programs, overhead and salaries. The
government spent only $25 million on "outreach programs" in the entire Arab
and Muslim world.

"To say that financial resources are inadequate to the task is a gross
understatement," the report concludes.

Senior State Department officials said that they were very pleased with the
report and that they hoped it would pave the way for increased financing for
these activities.

The panel's recommendations - including the establishment of a special White
House coordinator for public relations efforts abroad - come at a time when
some American officials acknowledge that programs even in the last couple of
years have been confused and fitful.

The Bush administration, for example, started a program called "shared
values" last year, a series of television commercials showing that Muslims
in the United States lead lives of dignity and equal rights. The
advertisements were suspended after several Arab countries refused to show
them.

Many in the administration were privately critical of the commercials,
agreeing with Arab and Muslim spokesmen who said they were irrelevant to
Muslim concerns about American policies toward Iraq and Israel.

The advisory panel said that it recognized that American policies might well
be the root of the problem, but that Washington could do far more to present
its side of the issues and rebut widespread misinformation among Muslims
overseas.

In an interview, Mr. Djerejian, a former ambassador to Syria and Israel,
pointed to the power of Arab satellite television, and the absence of
American perspectives there. He said he was struck during a recent visit to
Cairo when he saw a panel discussion on Al Arabiya television about the
"Americanization" - a code word for corruption - of Islam.

"It was their version of our saying that extremists have hijacked Islam," he
said. "But during that whole two-hour program, there wasn't one person who
could in any way convey the American context."

Another panel delegate visited some of the worst slums in Casablanca,
Morocco, Mr. Djerejian added. "She said it was your worst nightmare," he
said of the delegate. "Those hovels all had no plumbing, but they all had
satellite TV dishes. You know, Woody Allen said 90 percent of life is just
showing up. In the Arab world, the United States just doesn't show up."

Mr. Djerejian said that compared with the early 1990's, spending on "public
diplomacy" had dropped more than 30 percent in dollars, and probably closer
to 50 percent in real terms. Compared with the high spending levels in the
1980's, at a peak in the cold war under President Ronald Reagan, the drop
has been far sharper, he said. Mr. Djerejian was a deputy White House press
secretary for foreign affairs from 1985 to 1986 in the Reagan
administration.

The panel's recommendation may get traction, in the view of some of its
officials, by invoking the crisis of the cold war. Its members and
supporters note that the State Department has requested sharp increases in
financing for its "public diplomacy" activities but has been rebuffed by
President Bush's budget aides.

At the beginning of the cold war, the United States Information Agency was
created to explain and promote American policies. The Voice of America,
Radio Free Europe and other related entities were filled with programs and
news reports.

There was no recommendation to revive the information agency itself, which
was dismantled in 1999 and folded into the State Department. Rather, the
panel recommended that steps be taken to coordinate public relations efforts
with other agencies.

The advisory group's report, titled "Changing Minds, Winning Peace," was
issued only four months after the panel was created in June 2003 at the
request of Representative Frank R. Wolf, Republican of Virginia and chairman
of a subcommittee of the House Appropriations Committee.

Mr. Djerejian, director of the James A. Baker III Institute for Public
Policy at Rice University, said he tried to pick a bipartisan cross-section
for members of the panel. Among them are Shibley Telhami, a scholar at the
University of Maryland, and John Zogby, an expert on public opinion in the
Arab world.

The group's major recommendations, besides creating a new White House
director of public diplomacy, were to build libraries and information
centers in the Muslim world, translate more Western books into Arabic,
increase scholarships and visiting fellowships, upgrade the American
Internet presence, and train more Arabists, Arab speakers and public
relations specialists.

A photograph in the report, showing a picture of the Cairo opera house, said
the structure had gained credit for the Japanese for its construction, while
the United States got no credit for building the city's infrastructure. A
new consulate in Istanbul, it said, "satisfies important security concerns"
but looks like a "crusader's castle" atop a mountain.

[ w.gif of type image/gif removed by lists.casi.org.uk -
   attachments are not permitted on the CASI lists ]




_______________________________________________
Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss
To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk
All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk


[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]