Re: [casi] Why We Are Winning in Iraq

[Aswed@DELETETHISaol.com]

[ Presenting plain-text part of multi-format email ]

dear friends
it seems that the white house agrees that "....we are winning"...tsk tsk
tsk...shame will do.

October 6, 2003
White House to Overhaul Iraq and Afghan Missions
By DAVID E. SANGER

ASHINGTON, Oct. 5 — The White House has ordered a major reorganization of
American efforts to quell violence in Iraq and Afghanistan and to speed the
reconstruction of both countries, according to senior administration officials.
The new effort includes the creation of an "Iraq Stabilization Group," which
will be run by the national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice. The decision
to create the new group, five months after Mr. Bush declared the end of active
combat in Iraq, appears part of an effort to assert more direct White House
control over how Washington coordinates its efforts to fight terrorism, develop
political structures and encourage economic development in the two countries.
It comes at a time when surveys show Americans are less confident of Mr.
Bush's foreign policy skills than at any time since the terrorist attacks two
years ago. At the same time, Congress is using President Bush's request for $87
billion to question the administration's failure to anticipate the violence in
Iraq and the obstacles to reconstruction.
"This puts accountability right into the White House," a senior
administration official said.
The reorganization was described in a confidential memorandum that Ms. Rice
sent Thursday to Secretary of State Colin L. Powell, Secretary of Defense
Donald H. Rumsfeld, and the director of central intelligence, George J. Tenet.
Asked about the memorandum on Sunday, Ms. Rice called it "a recognition by
everyone that we are in a different phase now" that Congress is considering Mr.
Bush's request for $20 billion for reconstruction and $67 billion for military
operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. She said it was devised by herself, Vice
President Dick Cheney, Mr. Powell and Mr. Rumsfeld in response to discussions
she held with Mr. Bush at his ranch in late August.
The creation of the group, according to several administration officials,
grew out of Mr. Bush's frustration at the setbacks in Iraq and the absence of
more visible progress in Afghanistan, at a moment when remnants of the Taliban
appear to be newly active. It is the closest the White House has come to an
admission that its plans for reconstruction in those countries have proved
insufficient, and that it was unprepared for the guerrilla-style attacks that have
become more frequent in Iraq. There have been more American deaths in Iraq since
the end of active combat than during the six weeks it took to take control of
the country.
"The president knows his legacy, and maybe his re-election, depends on
getting this right," another administration official said. "This is as close as
anyone will come to acknowledging that it's not working."
Inside the State Department and in some offices in the White House, the
decision to create the stabilization group has been interpreted as a direct effort
to diminish the authority of the Pentagon and Mr. Rumsfeld in the next phase
of the occupation. Senior White House officials denied that was the case, and
said in interviews on Sunday that the idea had been created by members of the
National Security Council and embraced by Mr. Rumsfeld, who has been a
lightning rod for criticism about poor postwar planning.
"Don recognizes this is not what the Pentagon does best, and he is, in some
ways, relieved to give up some of the authority here," a senior official
insisted, noting that L. Paul Bremer III, the head of the allied provisional
authority in Iraq, will still report to the Defense Department. But one of Mr.
Bremer's key deputies will sit on the new stabilization group, giving him a direct
line outside the Pentagon.
Mr. Rumsfeld's spokesman, Lawrence Di Rita, said Sunday that the defense
secretary was "aware of the new approach" and noted that Mr. Bremer's
"relationship with Rumsfeld remains unchanged."
If Mr. Rumsfeld is giving up some authority, officials say, so is Mr. Powell.
The State Department has been in charge of the Afghan reconstruction effort,
but now the White House will assert new control over the interagency effort
there.
"While the problems in Afghanistan are less complex," a senior official said,
"the president wanted to know how come it took so long to get the highway
under construction." That project has become symbolic of the slow pace of
reconstruction, especially outside the capital.
The creation of the stabilization group appears to give more direct control
to Ms. Rice, one of the president's closest confidantes, who signed the
memorandum announcing it. For the first two and a half years of Mr. Bush's
presidency, Ms. Rice often seemed hesitant to take a more active role, eschewing the
kind of hands-on approach for which Henry A. Kissinger and other national
security advisers were known, and viewing her job chiefly as providing quiet advice
to Mr. Bush.
Now, four of her deputies will run coordinating committees — on
counterterrorism efforts, economic development, political affairs in Iraq and the creation
of clearer messages to the media here and in Baghdad.
Each working group will include under secretaries from the State, Defense and
Treasury Departments, and senior representatives from the Central
Intelligence Agency.
State Department officials have complained bitterly that they have been shut
out of decision-making about Iraq, even as attacks on American troops
increased, lights failed and oil production remained stuck far below even prewar
levels.
Mr. Bush, a senior administration official said, made it clear that he wanted
"all the powers of the government" turned toward making the reconstruction
work in both Iraq and Afghanistan. "The president is impatient with
bureaucracy," the official said.
In the interview, Ms. Rice described the new organization as one intended to
support the Pentagon, not supplant it.
"The N.S.C. staff is first and foremost the president's staff," she said,
"but it is of course the staff to the National Security Council." That group will
in effect be taking more direct responsibility.
The council is made up of top advisers to the president who meet three times
a week in the Situation Room. They have often seemed unable to coordinate
efforts on the main issues relating to the occupation of Iraq. "The Pentagon
remains the lead agency, and the structure has been set up explicitly to provide
assistance to the Defense Department and coalition provisional authority," Ms.
Rice said.
Other officials said the effect of Ms. Rice's memorandum would be to move
day-to-day issues of administering Iraq to the White House.
The counterterrorism group, for example, will be run by Frances F. Townsend,
Ms. Rice's deputy for that field. Economic issues — from oil to electricity to
the distribution of a new currency — will be coordinated by Gary Edson. He
has been the liaison between the National Security Council and the National
Economic Council.
Robert D. Blackwill, a former ambassador to India, will run the group
overseeing the creation of political institutions in Iraq, as well as directing
stabilization for Afghanistan.
Anna Perez, Ms. Rice's communications director, will focus on a coordinated
media message — a response to concerns about the daily reports of attacks on
American troops and lawlessness in the streets.


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Home | Privacy Policy | Search |
Corrections | Help | Back to Top

_______________________________________________
Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss
To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk
All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk