The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
Three articles [reproduced below] about Iraq in todays (16th June) Independent. There is some conflict here: Cockburn's piece is titled "Iraq sees hope for end to sanctions" and talks of a "sudden amity between Mr Butler and Mr Aziz" while Winfield writes that "The United States had hoped to transform the [oil-for-food] deal, which must be renewed by the Security Council every six months, into a programme that would continue as long as economic sanctions remain in place." Gabriel. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Baghdad warning on oil-for-food deal. By Nicole Winfield in New York Iraq warned the United Nations Security Council yesterday that it would withdraw from the oil-for-food programme if council members approved a resolution stipulating the programme was an ongoing operation. "We told all council members that this would mean disengaging Iraq from the programme," Iraq's UN ambassador, Nizar Hamdoon, said yesterday after delivering the warning to the council president, Antonio Monteiro of Portugal. Iraq was barred from freely exporting oil in 1990 following its invasion of Kuwait. In 1996, the council approved the oil-for-food programme, which allows limited exports of Iraqi oil to fund humanitarian supplies and to compensate Gulf War victims. The United States had hoped to transform the deal, which must be renewed by the Security Council every six months, into a programme that would continue as long as economic sanctions remain in place. Late last month, the US tried in a draft resolution to link that proposal to the approval of a $300m (185m) shipment of spare parts for Iraq's oil industry. But the proposal ran into resistance from Britain and other council members. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Iraq sees hope for end to sanctions By Patrick Cockburn RICHARD BUTLER, head of the United Nations team monitoring the elimination of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, has said in Baghdad that he hopes outstanding issues will be resolved in the next two months. He said agreement has been reached with the Iraqi government on the inspection process. It is all very different in tone from Mr Butler's previous visits. Standing next to Tariq Aziz, the Iraqi deputy prime minister, Mr Butler said: "Mr Aziz and I will take stock on 9 August, and it is my earnest hope that when we do that we will be looking at a slate which has been pretty well ticked off." Previously, Iraq routinely denounced Mr Butler, the former Australian ambassador to the UN, as no more than an American agent, determined to prevent economic sanctions on Iraq being lifted by always demanding fresh information on its biological, chemical, nuclear and missile programmes. Only last week, the Iraqi newspaper Babal, controlled by Uday, the elder son of the Iraqi leader, Saddam Hussein, said, in reference to Mr Butler that it was time to "stop courting this mad dog". It even suggested, continuing the analogy, that, abandoning Iraqi traditions of tolerance and courtesy, "the time has come to chop off the tongue of this dog". The sudden amity between Mr Butler and Mr Aziz is hard to explain. But both sides are on their best behaviour. The critical moment for Iraq will be Mr Butler's next report in October on Iraq's compliance with UN resolutions on eliminating weapons of mass destruction. Baghdad wants to show to sympathetic members of the Security Council that it has done all in its power to meet the demands of the UN Special Committee (Unscom) on weapons of mass destruction, which Mr Butler heads. Mr Butler, for his part, was criticised by Russia and France during the last crisis between Iraq and the UN in February for his belligerent rhetoric towards Iraq. At one moment he even implied that Baghdad might attack Israel and raze Tel Aviv. His more moderate approach during his present visit to Iraq may not necessarily lead to a clean bill of health for Iraq in October. After the UN envoy delivered his last, very negative, report on Iraq's compliance with UN resolutions in April, General Amr al-Saadi, adviser to President Saddam on Unscom, told The Independent: "The role played by Butler to serve American policy against Iraq is worse than any role played by an ordinary spy." He said the April report implied that Iraq had done nothing to eliminate its weapons since 1991. General Saadi said one of the problems for Iraq was that in 1995 it handed over relevant documents on its weapons programmes secreted to the UN by General Hussein Kamel, who defected to Jordan. "We don't have a copy," Saadi said. "We don't know what the documents say. They (Unscom) come up with selective quotes from them, which we haven't seen before. The papers provide a gold mine for procrastination." The US and Britain are eager to maintain sanctions on Iraq, but not to repeat the confrontation of February. The US is scaling down its task force in the Gulf, which was dispatched with much fanfare at the beginning of the year. One aircraft carrier and Stealth bombers have been withdrawn. Officials in Washington say they are prepared to be more flexible in allowing Iraq to spend money for humanitarian and development purposes, so long as they can prevent Saddam Hussein from gaining control of cash inflows from Iraq's oil revenues. These are limited to $4bn every six months by the lack of spare parts for the Iraqi oil industry. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ US will fund opposition to Saddam By Andrew Marshall in Washington the uniteD STATES will announce a new strategy for boosting the Iraqi opposition to Saddam Hussein this week. Propelled by Congress and anxious to fill the vacuum left by the disintegration of previous policies, the US will announce a programme of $5m (3.1m) to assist the opposition. The plan is likely to include some support for Shia opposition groups based in Iran for the first time. The US established the Iraq National Congress (INC) as the main channel for Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) support after the 1991 invasion of Kuwait. But relations with the INC deteriorated and support was switched to the London-based Iraqi National Accord. Both were effectively wiped out on the ground when Saddam's forces moved into Iraqi Kurdistan in 1996. Since then, the opposition has fragmented with infighting and lack of resources and presence on the ground apparently dooming it to impotence. But pressure has built up for a new policy. Congress has pushed for a more active stance to overthrow President Saddam and the existing policy of containment through weapons inspections and sanctions is starting to look threadbare. Last month, Congress approved the $5m along with plans for a new radio station broadcasting to Iraq, and this week the administration is expected to announce how the cash will be spent. The money will be overt rather than secret, and is likely to be put towards boosting the democratic credentials of the opposition. One possibility would be to support moves by the opposition to create a council of national unity, drawing together all the different factions. A meeting was held in London last February organised by the INA to enable the organisations to speak with one voice, and there have also been suggestions that something approximating a government in exile might be formed in London. The US is anxious to demonstrate that it does not regard the current Iraqi regime as salvageable, as do many of its erstwhile allies in the Gulf War coalition. Instead, it will underline that it is working towards a new regime, formed from the democratic opposition. But with the evaporation of the opposition it has found it hard to claim that there is an alternative. The US's discussions with the opposition have included for the first time a Tehran-based group, the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq (Sciri). As the name might suggest, it has little in common with the US and has been working very closely with the Islamic regime in Iran. But alone of the opposition groups, it has ground forces in Iraq which harass Iraqi troops in the south of the country. It represents elements within Iraq's substantial Shia minority. Contacts between the US and the Sciri have accelerated this year, with frequent trips by the movement's leader, Mohammed Bakir al-Hakim, to Kuwait, where US forces and aircraft are based. Hamid Bayati, the organisation's London representative, visited Washington last week and met representatives of the US government. Relations between the US and Iran have warmed noticeably since the election of the moderate Mohammad Khatami as Iran's President last year. Iran and the US have few interests in common, but they do share a desire to limit Iraq's aggression. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a discussion list run by Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To be removed/added, email soc-casi-discuss-request@lists.cam.ac.uk, NOT the whole list. Archived at http://linux.clare.cam.ac.uk/~saw27/casi/discuss.html