The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.

[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

military sanctions (non-WMD & delivery)



A lot of the harm being caused in Iraq is due to sanctions on 
anything that might have a miltary use - instead of focussing just on 
WMD and delivery systems.

The regularly trotted out excuse is to prevent SH from threatening 
his neighbours. Can the anti-sanctions movement not try and 
change this focus (whilst also trying to achieve our wider aims)?

SH does not pose a realistic (conventional) threat AT ALL given a 
Western presence in the region.

Iran (Iraq, the aggressor, was supported by the West)
Kuwait (green flag from the US ambassador to Iraq)
Israel (whilst Iraq was being destroyed)

Mark Parkinson
Bodmin
Cornwall

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a discussion list run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq
For removal from list, email soc-casi-discuss-request@lists.cam.ac.uk
Full details of CASI's various lists can be found on the CASI website:
http://www.casi.org.uk


[Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]