The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
When China was not having nuclear bombs, It was treated badly by USA. Now when they acquired Nukes they are given Veto in United Nation. Similarly after India & Pak getting the Nuclear Bomb technology are respected in the world. Our world believes only those countries which have already acquired weapons of Mass destructions should be allowed to advance them. USA, Britain, Russia, China, India, Israel, Pakistan etc are allowed to develop better weapons but small countries which oppose USA are seen as a threat to whole world. Why should the world think that USA needs weapons for it's safety and not the smaller Nations. The reality is USA have acted as terrorist more than other countries. USA attacks other countries without giving importance to United Nations. But when other country does something for it's safety it is considered violation of United Nations. Is only the life of people living in USA so important. Are people of other countries cocks and hens in a butcher shop to be killed by terrorists and USA. NATO which includes only America and it's allies should be banned since it threatens the existence of United Nation. Why should not a democratic country America understand the meaning of democracy. Which says equality to all. Should there not be equality to all Nations. America killed many more than whole world combined in World war II by using Nuclear bomb for the first time on Japan. Reality is today a murderer and a terrorist have become the Judge. How much and what type of weapons are needed for safety of a Nation is to be determined by the country people Not by it's enemy country. It's foolishness for a Nation to develop weapons which it's enemy asks him to develop then there is no significance of such weapons. Does anyone use locks and safety in banks according to what thief's and burglars want or what the safety they really need for safety? Safety issue is a personal issue. No other country should intervene other countries safety issues. What if some country asks USA to stop all it security measures, isn't it absurd? USA will decide how much safety is needed not the people of other countries. United Nation should try to stop such bulling efforts of USA. It's a crime to bully weaker people so it is also a crime to bully small countries by stronger country. USA is raping and insulting integrity of weak countries which is a crime according to all laws in this world. If United Nation doesn't stop USA from doing such activities God will punish it. Hope world understand my point of view where every one is given equality. Where everyone's human rights are preserved. Regards Sanjay Sharma. _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk