The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
Dear Colin, So chlorine WAS banned long enough for the predictions spelled out in IWTV to come true. Much longer than that, in fact. Which is clearly genocidal. Let's not obscure this. Best Attila Colin Rowat <c.rowat@espero.org.uk> 2003.08.13. 17:20:08 +1h-kor írta: > I think that Andrew is probably correct, but would welcome correction by > other list members. Section 2a of Unicef's "Situation Analysis of Children > and Women in Iraq - 1997" (indexed at > http://www.casi.org.uk/info/unicef9804.html) notes that: > > "Local supplies of chlorine and alum are minimal. ... Importation has not > been possible." [p. 10 of section] > > "Chlorine is now being provided to the water treatment plants through the > Oil for Food programme beginning 1997." [p. 16 of section] _______________________________________________ Sent via the discussion list of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq. To unsubscribe, visit http://lists.casi.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/casi-discuss To contact the list manager, email casi-discuss-admin@lists.casi.org.uk All postings are archived on CASI's website: http://www.casi.org.uk