The following is an archived copy of a message sent to a Discussion List run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
Views expressed in this archived message are those of the author, not of the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq.
[Main archive index/search] [List information] [Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq Homepage]
I didn't say anything about dates. I was talking about GOVERNMENTS AROUND THE WORLD BREAKING THE SANCTIONS, based on the very evident fact that they are killing people. I'm not sure how much clearer I can say it! It would be interesting to hear from other people on the list: should CASI and other campaigns against sanctions bypass the impossible goal of a veto of the Security Council resolutions and instead call for the resumption of normal (and non military) trade with Iraq based on principles of human rights? Philippa >===== Original Message From Bert Gedin <gedinbert@hotmail.com> ===== >Ms Winkler, >Profuse apols for the delay - I hadn't forgotten. >You may be right, that diplomats/policymakers etc., whether from the >U.S.(organ-grinder) or U.K.(monkey) "follow a line", thereby possibly being >- to put it politely - "time-wasters". Sometimes it may be more >purposeful to converse with a brick wall! >You state your case, in various matters, quite eloquently - nothing much for >me to add. But I slam the brakes on when you start discussing sanctions. >Quite so, not even His Holiness has succeeded in getting sanctions lifted. >But people, such as ourselves, as well as religious or political leaders >etc., need patience & "stickability", and not to forget the long-term view >(a sense of vision). People were grumbling, during the Roman Empire, >thinking their glorious Caesars would rule forever. That was mistaken, >although not much consolation if you're about to be fed to the lions! >Anti-sanction campaigning, obviously, needs to continue ("Never say >never!"), and, yes, some organisations or individuals, even governments, may >well try to "break" sanctions, e.g. by purchasing dates from worker's >co-operatives in Iraq. It's not enough, though, I believe, to be >over-preoccupied with fighting symptoms of the cancer -one also requires a >holistic view of what - in the political realm - health is all about, and >this as something to aspire to. >None of us, possibly, have the "ideal" solution. Much remains to be done at >a multitude of levels, education, politics, economy, trade unions, Churches >& Temples etc., science, media etc., etc., etc. Yet, if we do see a need for >compassion, in the world, do we not owe it to each other to manifest that we >are really serious about righting the wrongs everywhere around us? >Bert. > > > >_________________________________________________________________ >Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > >-- >----------------------------------------------------------------------- >This is a discussion list run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq >For removal from list, email soc-casi-discuss-request@lists.cam.ac.uk >CASI's website - www.casi.org.uk - includes an archive of all postings. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a discussion list run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq For removal from list, email soc-casi-discuss-request@lists.cam.ac.uk CASI's website - www.casi.org.uk - includes an archive of all postings.